Portal Fix Pack 6.0.1.7 error on linux

  • 14 Dec, 2010

The error message bellow appears when the owner of the file wpsconfig.sh is different from the owner of the Fix Pack 6.0.1.7 files

Error ( 2 ): IOException creating RunTime(): /opt/ibm/WebSphere/PortalServer/config/WPSconfig.sh: cannot execute
Error 112 – Return code (888) differs from the expected code (0).

To solve the problem change the owner of the WPSconfig.sh to match the owner of the Fix Pack files.

Related Posts

Error when run dnf install rpm-build

  • 31 Mar, 2025

I was installing the IBM MQ Server on a linux box yesterday. I got the error bellow: \root@gateway MQServer\ dnf install rpm-build
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
Instana 14 B/s | 20 B 00:01
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'instana-agent': Status code: 401 for https://:[email protected]/agent/rpm/generic/x86\64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 34.253.98.124)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'instana-agent': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried
Solution: Delete the Instana Agent repo: rm /etc/yum.repos.d/Instana-Agent.repo
Clear dnf cache: dnf clean all
run dnf i

Error when run dnf install rpm-buildRead More

How to Install watch on macOS Sequoia

  • 06 Feb, 2025

The watch command is a useful utility in Unix-like systems that allows you to execute a command periodically and display its output. However, macOS does not come with watch pre-installed. If you're running macOS Sequoia and want to use watch, follow the steps below to install it. Recently i switch my mabook to a new MacBook Pro M2 and try to use the command to watch some openshift logs and i got the following result: !(

How to Install watch on macOS SequoiaRead More

rsync is faster than scp to copy files between machines

  • 31 Dec, 2024

rsync is generally faster than scp for copying files, especially when transferring a large amount of data or syncing directories. Here's why: 1. Incremental Transfers - rsync: Only transfers the parts of files that have changed, rather than the entire file. This makes subsequent transfers much faster. - scp: Always transfers the entire file, even if only a small part of it has changed. 2. Compression - rsync: Supports compression during the transfer (using the -z option), which reduces the amount of data sent over the network. - scp: Also supports compression (using the -C option), but it doesn't have the same efficiency in skipping unchanged data. 3. Resume Support - rsync: Can

rsync is faster than scp to copy files between machinesRead More